Use SLA for detail and appearance
Smooth resin parts support visual models, ergonomic reviews, access studies, master patterns and early mating checks.
Choose high-detail resin for visual and fit evaluation or durable nylon for functional prototype handling and complex unsupported geometry.
SLA and SLS answer different prototype questions. SLA is suited to smooth, detailed resin models where appearance, access and fit are the priority. SLS produces durable nylon parts without conventional support structures, making it useful for functional handling, snap fits, interlocking geometry and more demanding fit checks. The correct choice follows what the team needs to learn from the next revision.
Process selection should follow the drawing, application, material, critical features and the condition in which the part needs to arrive.
Smooth resin parts support visual models, ergonomic reviews, access studies, master patterns and early mating checks.
Nylon SLS parts are suited to snap fits, complex assemblies and prototypes that need more robust handling than a visual resin model.
When the design must prove final alloy behavior, precision surfaces or production material, the workflow can move to CNC machining, metal additive or molding.
Use these pages to connect the process with the device category, material and next project decision.
Choose SLA when fine detail and a smooth visual model matter most. Choose SLS when the part needs durable nylon, complex geometry or functional handling.
Yes. Both processes can support fit evaluation, with the choice driven by detail, surface, geometry and expected handling.
Molding becomes relevant when the design is stable, production-representative resin and repeatability matter, and the expected quantity supports tooling.
Send the CAD, quantity, material, finish and target date for a process review and quote.